Other PIDs --> Personal Information Device:
VRU path prediction

This triple is bi-directional. See also Personal Information Device --> Other PIDs: VRU path prediction

Definitions

VRU path prediction (Information Flow): The predicted future path of travel by the VRUs equipment. This flow includes an indication of the future positions of the transmitting traveler that can be used by receiving connected devices to support coordinated travel maneuvers and enhance collision avoidance.

Other PIDs (Source Physical Object): 'Other PIDs' represents other personal information devices (PIDs) that are communicating with the device. This includes all connected personal information devices that support wireless short-range communications, including those used by pedestrians, cyclists, and other vulnerable road users (VRUs). This object provides a source and destination for information transfers between connected personal devices. The host device, represented by the Personal Information Device physical object, sends information to, and receives information from the Other PIDs to model all connected personal-to-personal (P2P) communications in ARC-IT.

Personal Information Device (Destination Physical Object): The 'Personal Information Device' provides the capability for travelers to receive formatted traveler information wherever they are. Capabilities include traveler information, trip planning, and route guidance. Frequently a smart phone, the Personal Information Device provides travelers with the capability to receive route planning and other personally focused transportation services from the infrastructure in the field, at home, at work, or while en-route. Personal Information Devices may operate independently or may be linked with vehicle on-board equipment. This subsystem also supports safety related services with the capability to broadcast safety messages and initiate a distress signal or request for help.

Included In

This Triple is in the following Service Packages:

This Triple is described by the following Functional View Functional Objects:

This Triple is described by the following Functional View Data Flows:

  • None

This Triple has the following triple relationships:

None

Communication Solutions

Solutions are sorted in ascending Gap Severity order. The Gap Severity is the parenthetical number at the end of the solution.

Selected Solution

(None-Data) - Secure Wireless Internet (EU)

Solution Description

This solution is used within Australia and the E.U.. It combines standards associated with (None-Data) with those for I-M: Secure Wireless Internet (EU). The (None-Data) standards include an unspecified set of standards at the upper layers. The I-M: Secure Wireless Internet (EU) standards include lower-layer standards that support secure communications between two entities, either or both of which may be mobile devices, but they must be stationary or only moving within wireless range of a single wireless access point (e.g., a parked car). Security is based on X.509 certificates. A non-mobile (if any) endpoint may connect to the service provider using any Internet connection method.

ITS Application Entity
Mind the gap

Development needed
Click gap icons for more info.
Mgmt
Facilities

Development needed
Security
Mind the gapMind the gap
TransNet
Access
TransNet TransNet

TempBCL2 TempSTDL2

TempBCL3 TempSTDL3

TempBCL4 TempSTDL4

TempBCL5 TempSTDL5

Access Access

TempBCL2 TempSTDL2

TempBCL3 TempSTDL3

TempBCL4 TempSTDL4

TempBCL5 TempSTDL5

ITS Application ITS Application

TempBCL2 TempSTDL2

TempBCL3 TempSTDL3

TempBCL4 TempSTDL4

TempBCL5 TempSTDL5

Mgmt Mgmt

TempBCL2 TempSTDL2

TempBCL3 TempSTDL3

TempBCL4 TempSTDL4

TempBCL5 TempSTDL5

Facility Facility

TempBCL2 TempSTDL2

TempBCL3 TempSTDL3

TempBCL4 TempSTDL4

TempBCL5 TempSTDL5

Security Security

TempBCL2 TempSTDL2

TempBCL3 TempSTDL3

TempBCL4 TempSTDL4

TempBCL5 TempSTDL5

Note that some layers might have alternatives, in which case all of the gap icons associated with every alternative may be shown on the diagram, but the solution severity calculations (and resulting ordering of solutions) includes only the issues associated with the default (i.e., best, least severe) alternative.

Characteristics

Characteristic Value
Time Context Recent
Spatial Context Regional
Acknowledgement True
Cardinality Unicast
Initiator Source
Authenticable True
Encrypt False


Interoperability Description
National This triple should be implemented consistently within the geopolitical region through which movement is essentially free (e.g., the United States, the European Union).

Security

Information Flow Security
  Confidentiality Integrity Availability
Rating Low High Moderate
Basis Information intentionally shared with surrounding users that might cooperate. Initial use cases suggest broadcast-mode communications, and no presumption of obfuscation. MMV clustering applications need timeliness and protection of data to ensure that platooning-like operations happen without incident. Data integrity protections rated higher than availability because incorrect/modified data could lead to catastrophic consequences given the lack of protection that most MMVs offer, and the fact that they operate in close proximity to pedestrians. MMV clustering applications need timeliness and protection of data to ensure that platooning-like operations happen without incident. Data integrity protections rated higher than availability because incorrect/modified data could lead to catastrophic consequences given the lack of protection that most MMVs offer, and the fact that they operate in close proximity to pedestrians.


Security Characteristics Value
Authenticable True
Encrypt False